There is no debate about Black-White gaps or sub-Saharan Africa estimates of 70-80 IQ. The entire so-called debating of the issue is used to justify the world envisioned by proponents of White ethno-states and ethno-nationalist ideology and done by individuals in bad faith and bot armies. In truth, all we find are White people, who are still overwhelmingly the majority demographic in online spaces and publicly constantly discussing about Black people and about what they want (or should do) to or with Black people.
This Professor’s interview here is trending currently, and this topic riles up the White ethnonationalists from whatever slumber they get. It is very much connected to another recent commentator, Andrew Branca who claimed that the single most powerful driver of the different qualities of life across the globe are demographic variances in IQ.
Look at this rat. These people want to be the decision-makers of what goes on in this world, and replace the professional world with their commentary, and they have in ways succeeded at this unfortunately. Spreading the position that global IQ differences drive quality-of-life variances is part of the current wave of attacks on immigration, which prompted this response in rebuttal from this man in the blue suit.
He rebuts by debunking Internet trending claims that African countries have the world’s lowest national average IQ scores (often cited as in the 60s-70s for nations like Cameroon, Ghana, and Liberia). He argues that these figures, frequently shared on social media, are not based on actual widespread IQ testing in Africa but on flawed, outdated methodologies, primarily extrapolations from small, non-representative 1950s studies where researchers inferred IQ from occupations (e.g., assuming farmers have lower IQ than accountants) without administering proper tests.Key points he makes. Proper IQ testing is resource-intensive with 2-3 hours per person and rarely done at scale in many African contexts.
Scores in the 60-70 range would imply severe cognitive impairment (e.g., inability to dress or feed oneself), which doesn’t align with observed realities. He views the circulation of these claims as part of a broader propaganda campaign against Africa, harmful to business and investment (he mentions having investments there). The man calls such data factually inaccurate and urges us to question sources!
SOCIAL COMMENTARY
This so-called debate and “tensions over IQ’s strengths and limits” does not really involve Black people in the “debate.” All people are going to say is that “Prof. Sternberg didn’t debunk IQ racial gaps.” “Sternberg, it’s in the name — Jew.” The fixation is in justification for Conservative and Race Realist politics and the implications from scientifically measured genetic IQ differences. I have seen the most complex and detailed online debates in spaces on this issue from geneticists and race realists. . .that it seems impossible any layperson should be partaking in such a debate on the intricacies of genetics. What we do know is what it means for the political Right to scientifically measure and prove genetic racial IQ differences, and that is to justify racial separation (segregation) or ethnostates and disprove “multiracial societies” as inherently dysfunctional due to incompatible average abilities.
The billionaire that controls X for example believes in this ideology and supports people and political parties with this ideology and thinking; and his bought and rigged platform always artifically features people with that thinking in top results. Not a Black person in sight, and even if, they get suppressed, or swarmed by bot troll comments. The race realists want to allow every group to thrive according to their “natural” or inherent capacities with (or without) conflict or forced equality. Therefore, engendering or increasingly inducing sense of alienation in Black people in particular is one of the strategies to make racial segregation and separatism appealing to Black people, as believed among past Black nationalists and their views “on the Cracka.” The opposition to integration and immigration is a sequential consequence of this position, therefore when such thinkers are in political power, policies promoting diversity, open borders or equal opportunity are attacked and removed with executive power and submissive courts.
What follows from this also are eugenic and selective policies within the favored group or restricting it in others. The purpose is also in countering the social narrative of post-colonial theory and negative attitudes against “White people” by bolstering claims of “White contributions to civilization” being genetically rooted. So, one is led to always downplay or argue against environmental or historical factors in disparities through any argumentative means that move more increasingly into “spiritual bio-politics” — this gets into territory of Evolian ideas that have spread to proponents of “White ethnostates” or who want to Make America look like 1950s Advertisement Fantasies Again. They don’t care about “mainstream scientific consensus among geneticists, psychologists and anthropologists.”
They don’t care about what any Black person has to say or their experiences in their environments, unless that Black person have views that agree with them or affirm their positions. All of this is tied into Whiteness and the super-assimilative identity that concept has taken on in claiming entire groups of people that did not see each other as the same, all to fight against us and among each other. Musk is obsessed with meritocracy and competence, immigration and demographics and “anti-Woke ideology.” The world’s richest man validates innate racial IQ gaps, equality politics and immigration contributing to great replacement arguments.
One of the men most responsible in our times in such a fight has been Jared Taylor (founded the American Renaissance), who was influenced by Southern Nordicists like Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard (early 20th century authors of The Passing of the Great Race and The Rising Tide of Color) and reflections on his Japanese heritage. Another very important person in this piece of American history of American Southern Nordicism that has been forgotten is North Carolinan Nordicist Thomas Dixon Jr. whose work provided the framework for The Birth of a Nation. In this ideal of the Reconstruction-era South, America was seen as a battleground for the survival of the white race against perceived “inferior” groups.
I am familiar with these works, because I’ve had an interest in studying these things since atleast the sixth grade. I am in my mid-30s now, and it does not take a Ph.D. and two-hundred thousand dollars in debt to study and reproduce factual information any free and public library can as equally provide. I am not a light-weight on the subjects, and it is a life-long passion of research. A University of Chicago professor asked me once with surprise, “how did you get interested in studying things like that (the roots of Nazi ideology)?” Well, I’m Black, and the history of these ideologies directly and still affect me; and arms me to defend against it. Yes, I do think as a black person you should read about the history of the Aryan Nordicists like the back of your own hand. It provides a much greater depth to understanding racism, when it is veiled under layers of “scientific racism” that appropriates science, theology and statistical data to scheme politically and influence policy.
Those who have found it distasteful that I write about politics do not understand the magnitude of how much all this intersects with everything I have written about; andit is not something to run away from and hide in meditation from the world. The kind of task of dissemination of the ideas and philosophies I write about once seen as an effort of universalist and eclectic movements, are being claimed to belong to the conveniently constructed “‘White’ Western Civilization,” and has been entirely overrun by a racialist ecosystem of networks — with continuous streams of financial backing and financial proliferation. The system now awards and enables people to monetize off spreading anti-Black racism. People like Jared Taylor go to other countries, where many Black people don’t go, and give paid lectures to talk to other ethnic groups about “Black people” and “Black people in America.” The attitudes are exported and exchanged between people who then come here and try to cozy up to White people.
Theosophists were made scapegoats to the popularization of the 20th century notions in esoteric German bio-politics and New Ageism and I systematically refute this, but I have to read some theosophist online telling me they avoid my website, because it “talks politics.” The topic of Intelligence is the central theme of Theosophy, of the very root of the Greek word and the Goddess! “Intelligence” and “Knowledge” has always been an important study for me, and I have expressed on numerous occasions my influence from Alfred Korzybski on intelligence, democracy, neuro-linguistic semantics and limitations, non-Aristotelian orientations and the importance of the human nervous system. Intelligence as the professor explained is diverse, and that understanding is part of the real discussions on modern education reform. The entire origin of the god of Intelligence/the fire of intellect/divine fire of mind is closely related to the ancient belief in the “divine spark,” which has been used by European and other esotericists to claim that Black people lack the “spark,” even when the concept existed throughout ancient Africa.
Black people do avoid the real intellectual racists and their arguments, because they just ignore them as not worth their time or don’t engage in the history of material that those who are clamoring to enter the political arena after Trump on the Right read. We will have to fight those who come next. The very people who want to talk obsessively about what Black people are doing or not doing to justify their politics aren’t a small niche group. Highly detailed, organized, widespread and systematic refutations (keyword: refutations not a refutation of one man people are waiting on to the work alone) of the race realists should be produced by Black people openly, so that when we are arguing against people like Jared Taylor we aren’t unprepared (which many people and reporters have been) clueless and think that the world where just calling a White person “racist” disarms or frightens them still exists. It doesn’t! Even that is no longer working on the “hated White Liberal.” Nobody cares! The game has evolved, and there has been absolutely no adaptation by Liberals and the Left, or any opposition to the conservative and race realist positions, and their ideas for political policies.
White ethnonationalist positions are being debunked every other day by people across the internet, but the way their beliefs have spread into the public and plays off of conditioned biases and racism, colorism, etc held by people and their worldviews (known or less known to themselves) is absolutely out of control.
The obsessions with “proving racial gaps in IQ” and “per capita” statistics to focus on “proving Black people are violent criminals” to justify how we ought to be perceived or “dealt with” in society is serious from the political Right, and it is a threat to American civility, our social fabric and legitimate future reforms in education that are really needed.
The American Minervan 
Leave a comment