Jiang Xueying’s lluminati theory on Breaking Points engages in a pattern of mythologizing oligarchs, financiers and those that govern institutional powers. His lectures seem normal, until you examine further.
I have used Jiang Xueqin before on the collapse of the post-World War global order and war with Iran, but going more into his work, he adapts Gnostic narratives and weave them into his Illuminati theories about who controls the world that is extremely counter-productive, and is contributing to the tactic of disinformation I analyzed in Independent Diplomacy: Counter Operation to Dugin’s Disinformation, Trump Administration and Anti-American Propaganda.
Professor Jiang spreads special theories, full of misinformation, which makes things worse. This was and remains an unfortunate and similar problem with others like Michael Tsarion. Jiang is also engaged in spreading the disorganizing and chaotic propaganda that makes it infinitely more difficult, because now we have Illuminati and Dajjalic conspiracies competing against an actual Zionist-Evangelical coalition that are engaged in the theatrics of Apocalyptic prophecy.
I do not agree with Xueying on Breaking Points, where he stated that by observing the Epstein files, the world appears to be run by secret societies.
Nearly 4,500,000 viewed this.
He says that you can name them the Illuminati, but he states, we don’t know who they are, but they control the military and national security operatives. So, why do you call them the ILLUMINATI? Jiang claims, that the Illuminati are composed of three groups: the Vatican, the Jesuits and the Sabbatean-Frankists. By admitting “we don’t know who they are” yet naming a precise (and false) appellation by which to identify unknown underlying elites, Jiang abuses the term “Illuminati” to conflate unrelated groups, slander historical rationalists, and perpetuate urban legends that obscure verifiable power analysis.
I will establish a position about conspiracism. In my recent article, Thomas Jefferson’s Enlightenment Republicanism against Illuminati Panic: Letter on Weishaupt’s Perfectibilist Ideal, I detail the early attacks against Thomas Jefferson in his defense of Adam Weishaupt in a private letter. To spread the hysteria to the masses, conspiracists needed to villainize and implicate a Founding Father to give it legitimacy. Jefferson picked the Illuminati scare apart with philosophical and historical context, but once the letter became public, the conspiracists adapted their tactic by using the letter to support their conspiracy about Illuminati infiltration in the American government. This history later in the 1820s led to the creation of the earliest third party in the U.S. known as the Anti-Masonic Party. These tactics were used long before social media and the age of post-truth. No number of fact-giving can defuse the spread of a conspiratorial lie once it has circulated in the minds of the masses, shaping how they read and view everything in accordance with religious fears and anxieties from economic woes.
Now, these views that mythologizes perverted materialists in power, who do act like Frankists composes a pop-culture syncretism that is distinct from the documented Bavarian Order of the Illuminati founded in 1776.
This Bavarian secret society known as “Illuminati” (Latin illuminatus, “enlightened” or “initiated adepts”) founded 1 May 1776 by Johann Adam Weishaupt (1748-1830), initially called the Perfectibilists was short-lived. Weishaupt, a professor of canon law at Ingolstadt did explicitly model its graded structure on Jesuit constitutions for discipline yet abhorred the Society of Jesus and used the Order to advance anti-clerical, secular Enlightenment goals: education reform separating church and state in Bavaria, moral self-scrutiny, republicanism, and human “perfectibility,” which is opposite of the Frankists. Weishaupt invoked Zoroastrian “Fire-Worship of the Magi” as allegory for the divine principle of reason (Logos) and posited an anarchist utopianism.
Modern claims of world domination, financier elites, or occult cabals reflect Joly antics and other eighteenth-century hearsay from Robison and Barruel that conflated everything. The Order failed as a vehicle for change, but Weishaupt’s ideas succeeded indirectly through broader Enlightenment secularism and revolutions.
Do not create myths or engage in myth-perpetuation about those who rule over you or govern you.
The Illuminati were explicitly anti-Jesuit, anti-Vatican, and are unrelated to Sabbatean-Frankists. The words, Illuminati and Sabbatean-Frankists should not be used together. Jiang’s tripartite Vatican, Jesuits and Sabbatean-Frankists is pure conspiracy syncretism. This is the “Epsteinism” propaganda against the West I have written about to justify the Shaytan or Dajjalic West discourse from the other side.
He borrowed their hierarchical model instrumentally while fighting their dominance over Bavarian education and politics. The Catholic Church and clergy (allied with anti-Illuminati Rosicrucians) instigated the Order’s suppression; and the edicts came from the Elector of Bavaria under ecclesiastical pressure.
This seventeenth to eighteenth-century Jewish antinomian messianic movements from Sabbatai Zevi to Jacob Frank is a staple of later anti-Jewish grand theories (Rothschild-Illuminati-Protocols). This hearsay is traced to the panic caused by Barruel and Robison that slandered Weishaupt, whose order was Protestant and Enlightenment-oriented and deist-republican, focused on secular perfectibility and natural morality. Jesus was reframed as an ethical teacher of liberty and equality. Enlightenment connotations of reason derive from the Latin word illuminare meaning intellectual light. Epstein files reveal documented elite networks of financiers, politicians, intelligence ties, possible honeypot operations operating through public institutions, capital, and state agencies. Attributing this to an unknowable secret society but then saying that they are the Illuminati composed of Jesuits, the Vatican and Frankists imports 1798-1800 style panic and propaganda that continues to distract and confuse Americans.
Thomas Jefferson’s 31 January 1800 letter is decisive, in explaining that during the early republic’s “Illuminati scare,” Federalist clergy and politicians (Jedidiah Morse et al.) claimed Weishaupt’s Order infiltrated America, caused the French Revolution, and threatened Christianity and the government. Jefferson called this the “ravings of a Bedlamite,” defended Weishaupt as an “enthusiastic Philanthropist” believing in “indefinite perfectibility of man,” and noted that secrecy was defensive against “tyranny & priests.” The real “conspiracy” was clerical-Federalist use of the label to attack republicanism. The conspiracists feared the spreading of information, reason and natural morality.
Jiang replicates this tactic, by propagating the idea that Epstein shows real power concentrations (military-intel operatives included) while labeling them Illuminati or Frankists, which mythologizes distributed institutional and oligarchic realities into a monolithic ancient cabal. The historical Illuminati sought the opposite of control, through moral perfection, which Weishaupt believed would dissolve the need for government domination, standing armies or security states. Jiang sadly engages in the subtle arts and specious half-truths that have served to discredit actual philanthropists and Enlightenment ideals, preventing the public from being educated well on the history, thereby undermining our own civilization.
Epstein’s revelations demand empirical dissection of state-corporate-intel networks, not copying eighteenth-century history or seventeenth-century sectarianism. Study the documented Order, reject the calumnies, misuses and analyze the real elites that we know without the label that has fueled panic for 240 years. The interview revealed that Jiang’s view is ordinary, and not insight into secret control, but it is the latest iteration of the panic the historical Illuminati’s own ideals were meant to dispel.
Do not let those with great reach and influence spread misinformation about this history that contributes to anti-esoteric discourse and narratives of history. Protect knowledge from those who co-opt the history of Occult Philosophy to explain who “controls the world,” educate those that misuse the term Illuminati, and stop the mythologizations.


Leave a comment