An Authoritative Refutation of Netanyahu’s view of the Judeo-Christian roots of the United States

INTRODUCTION

I extend my argument as correction point to the early Christian Masonic focus on Greco-Roman and Jewish influences, to the writings of Russell Kirk about American Roots, and to the arguments of the Religious Right and entire Christian Zionist culture. My editorial project is centered on reviving classical republicanism as the authentic ideological foundation of the United States, constituting a thorough, systematic, and uncompromising refutation of the claim that “there would be no United States of America without Jews and Christianity” or that the Republic rests on a “Judeo-Christian perspective of our civilization.” The American Republic was forged from Greco-Roman civic philosophy, Enlightenment rationalism, deistic natural rights, and eclectic classical traditions (Stoicism, pre-Stoic humanism, and Masonic-influenced symbolism). These are explicitly not dependent on Abrahamic exceptionalism, messianic narratives, or any “Judeo-Christian” synthesis. Such claims are treated as modern political inventions that distort history, give way to apocalyptic supremacism, and threatens the secular republic.

Republicanism is the Enlightenment’s creed, a “loose tradition” running from Cicero and Roman historians through Machiavelli, Harrington, Sidney, Montesquieu, and the American founders (Jefferson, Madison, Adams). It stresses civic virtue, liberty as non-domination, mixed constitution, rule of law, and resistance to arbitrary power — all this, drawn from pagan classical antiquity, not scripture. Gordon S. Wood stated that “republicanism was the ideology of the Enlightenment (…) classical republicanism was its creed.” The founders were classicists trained in Greco-Roman sources, and American neoclassical architecture and symbolism (fasces, Columbia, etc.) consciously revived the Roman Republic, which embraced elements of government and attitudes toward education and martial philosophy from the Spartans, Athenians, the Carolingian renaissance and the later Italian and German and renaissances among others as models to construct a unique mixed republic, that would avoid tyrannical rulers, divine-right monarchies and the errors of past governments that have followed a pattern of degeneration and decline. It is why it is called an experiment, not because it is a secret plot designed by an evil “cabal.” Clearly, the system is being abused, tested and stretched to its limits by the very people republican-minded citizens ought to be knowledgeable in guarding against.

The Republic was not “brought into the world” by Jews or Christianity. It was a deliberate reconstruction of ancient Roman civic philosophy, filtered through Renaissance humanism and Enlightenment secular vision of government, which has been attacked by anti-revolutionary conservatives since who have sought to blame everything on the move away from natural hierarchy, monarchy, etc. Jefferson’s “endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights” is merely a near-direct paraphrase of Cicero and Seneca’s universal “divine spark” (though inherent in all humans, not just men or white men), secularized into natural rights — and it does not originate in Judeo-Christianity. Pre-Stoic roots in human rights theory trace the same idea back further, gradually secularized through Renaissance humanists, Locke, and the founders.

John Adams said the U.S. Constitution is “made for a moral and religious people,” in reference to republicanism itself functioning as a civic religion or a way of life emphasizing virtue and the common good, and not Christianity as a state creed. “America is a Christian nation” mythology, Protestant intolerances and “Christian cultism” only degenerate the republican legacy.

Netanyahu is the central figure in a dangerous modern psychotic political right driven by eschatological accelerationism. Netanyahu’s public declarations that the “era of the Mashiach has come,” his ties to Rabbi Menachem Schneerson (who reportedly told him he would “pass the scepter to the Messiah”), and his invocation of “reaching the kingdom” during the 2026 Iran conflict is a characteristically apocalyptic supremacism. This fusion of Jewish messianism with Christian Zionist end-times prophecy is a threat to secular governance and the Republic itself.

It is vital that we begin disenfranchising evangelical influence in U.S. politics and military.

My stance extends to any “Judeo-Christian” exceptionalism. We demote the “chosen people” doctrine and messianic exclusivity as “late rhetorical inventions” designed for tribal cohesion, not as a universal truth. The Jewish Messiah concept was originally borrowed from Near Eastern royalist ideology and is not a foundation for Western civilization.

I have written articles that can help us to build argumentation against religious exceptionalist interpretations of U.S. government. In Our Pre-Stoic Roots in Human Rights Theory in the United States and Prophetic Pluralism and Oracular Enlightenment in Pre-Socratic Philosophy, I explain that human dignity and rights originate in ancient philosophical and theosophical concepts of a universal divine spark (reason), later secularized. Enlightenment thinkers (many deists) drew more from Locke, Montesquieu, and classics rather than from Biblical literalism.

The Critique of Arnaud Bertrand’s The Civilization that Never Needed God rejects any single-source secular narrative, because American republicanism is a hybrid of classical antiquity, theistic deism and Western philosophy; and therefore, not purely atheistic or Abrahamic.

My articles on Black Republicanism from January and on Early Black intellectuals (Wheatley to Douglass) demonstrate how our Black intellectuals mastered Greco-Roman classics precisely to refute ridiculous racial inferiority claims and expose the hypocrisy of a slaveholding republic, proving republican ideals are universal tools against domination, not ethnic or religious property.

It even began before these articles in my “Religion Approach” page and essays on Illuminati panic and Masonic duty, that Republicanism is framed as a progressive, eclectic civic vision compatible with secularism and enlightenment philosophy, explicitly opposing theocratic or messianic visions. Conspiracy myths that inflate Jewish and occult influence are dismissed as ahistorical distractions that weaken civic literacy.

From my perspective, Netanyahu’s claim is not merely historically false but is the exact form of religious-psychotic supremacism my writings combat. The United States was not midwifed by any Abrahamic exceptionalism but born from the classical republican tradition’s fight against arbitrary power, revived through Enlightenment reason and deistic humanism. To claim otherwise erases Cicero, the Roman Republic, Stoic universalism, and the founders’ deliberate turn toward pagan classics and natural rights. It replaces evidence-based civic virtue with eschatological theater that endangers the Republic’s survival. The mission is to arm citizens with this knowledge so they can reject such myths, preserve secular republicanism, and continue the revolution of ideas against domination — whether from kings, priests or self-proclaimed messianic intermediaries. Netanyahu’s claim is simply the latest symptom of the modern political class degenerating into religious psychosis we must rein in. Instead, many of the people believe in the myths and expectations so badly, they rather let the politicians continue this political theater, perhaps in hopes that those expectations bring about prophecies. I am not sure, but it is a threat against secular republicanism.


I am working to bring more context to the movements of the early republican revolutionaries, their networks and various developments in different parts of the world that Garibaldi and Mazzini sparked, and the differences in these visions from Theodor Herzl and Zionism.



ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dominique Johnson is a writer and author of The American Minervan created years ago and changed from its first iteration as Circle of Asia (11 years ago), because of its initial Eurasian focus. The change indicated increasing concern for the future of their own home country. He has spent many years academically researching the deeper philosophical classical sources of Theosophy, Eclecticism and American Republicanism to push beyond current civilizational limitations. He has spent his life since a youth dedicated to understanding what he sees as the “inner meanings” and instruction in classical literature, martial philosophies, world mythology and folklore for understanding both the nature of life and dealing with the challenges of life.




16 responses to “An Authoritative Refutation of Netanyahu’s view of the Judeo-Christian roots of the United States”

  1. … reposted this!

  2. … reposted this!

  3. … reposted this!

  4. Dominique Johnson Avatar

    Netanyahu’s perspective is distorted, and he seeks to continue making sense of U.S. alliance with Israel, and both using the Bible to justify their geopolitical strategies and decisions in the Middle East. With U.S. red states pushing the boundaries of secular government and distorting the meaning of our government by focusing it into a purely “Judeo-Christian” narrative that ignores and explains away how steeped Republicanism was and emerged out of a milieu and movement of Pagan Revivalism and the roots of colonial deism is ignored. They ignore the role Freemasonry played. The U.S. Founders’ were knowledgeable of this and represented it. The modern Protestant seeks to remain blind and rewrite history. This is a time to dethrone the Religious Right in this country.

    1. moshe kerr Avatar

      Why Jews despise the counterfeit NT as an abomination on the order of the child sacrifice Molech and the later fertility Baal & still much later Universal tawhid Allah. עבודה זרה shares a common denominator. Whether its the Assyrian exported Shomronim to the NT Xtians to the Arab/Muslims to the Karaites, they all refer to themselves as the Chosen People.

      Replacement theology always asserts that the “Latter Day Saints” JeZeus believer or “last prophet Muhammad” over shadow the brit cut with the Avot – that only they would father the Cohen people. Only the Avot – not Moshe or any other johnny come lately. בראשית-ברית אש does not refer to nor mean covenant. The fire of a Torah brit – a sworn alliance. Like as cut between HaShem and the Avot. Only the Avot received the brit; only their seed becomes the Am HaKohen; no later prophet, messiah, or revelation can override this brit alliance. The floods of Noach-false oaths-therefore define יראת אלהים.

      The Blessing\Curse distinction between the first two Sinai commandments separates השם לשמה – לא בשמים היא, from earlier Divine Names, such as אלהים, אל אליון, אל שדי etc which perceive the vision of held by the Avot as HaShem creator of the Heavens and the Earth. The kabbalah which Rav Nemuraskii passed over to me, that such Divine Names refer to the faces of the soul (future born seed in the heavens). Pesach dedicates יה; Shevuoth sanctifies האל. Rosh HaShanna dedicates אל; Yom Kuppur sanctifies אלהים. Sukkot dedicates אל שדי; Shemeni Atzeret sanctifies: איש האלהים. The k’vanna of these Divine Names dedicated each on the 6 days of Chol Shabbat; to sanctify wisdom time-oriented commandments made holy – עבודת השם. Shabbat ceases to do מלאכה, and has the soul name שלום. The spirit verb foundation upon which this Shabbat soul name stands upon – בטחון; no trust no shalom – hence ideally defines the k’vanna of the 3 meals.

      The 2nd Sinai curse commandment, defined through the later introduced Torah concept of tuma. The Golden Calf – אלהים. Contrast דברים כה:יח with שמות יב:לח. The Zohar suggests that כל הנחשלים אחריך ואתה עיף ויגע ולא ירא אלהים that this refers only to the ערב רב. Both Esav and Yishmael reject – to this day – the revelation of the Torah at Sinai. Therefore אין להם יראת אלהים cannot apply to Amalek but rather directly refers to the ערב רב. Herein serves an example of how משנה תורה makes a Legistlative review of the other four books of the Torah.

      The employment of the verse in D’varim as a precedent to the similar verse in Sh’mot defines T’NaCH and Talmudic common law. The eternal mitzva to war against Amalek therefore cannot apply to a family off shoot of Esav because, as mentioned above – neither Esav nor Yishmael accept the revelation of the Torah לשמה – לא בשמים היא. Therefore the mitzva of Amalek refers to antisemitism as a Torah curse, no different than the Torah curses which plagued Par’o in Egypt. Since this eternal Torah curse stands upon the foundation of the 2nd Sinai commandment, then Amalek directly refers to assimilated and intermarried Jews who therein “worship” עבודה זהר.

      The NT counterfeit cannot discern between מלאכה from עבודה. The Greek New Testament primarily uses broader terms like ἔργον (ergon, meaning “work”) and λατρεία (latreia, meaning “service” or “worship”). These terms do not have the same connotations of prohibition found in the Hebrew terms, leading to a lack of distinction in the original texts. The much later Vulgate translation clearly no different from the original Greek NT manuscripts because their Latin translations likewise completely fail to discern between the Hebrew מלאכה Latin Opus\עבודה-Servitium because the church עבודה זהר abomination worships/Opus their version of the Golden Calf-word translation which they call JeZeus.

      While λατρεία itself is not specifically used in the context of the Sabbath in the New Testament, it appears in passages that discuss worship and service to God, reflecting attitudes and practices related to Sabbath observance. Romans 12:1, Hebrews 9:1, Hebrews 12:28 all employ λατρεία translated as “worship”. This radically differs from the Torah which employs מלאכה as the unique Torah wisdom known as time-oriented commandments. The מלאכה wisdom – the k’vanna required to elevate עבודה Torah commandments unto מלאכה Torah commandments. The Vulgate has no such fundamental awareness of מלאכה because the Church denies the Oral Torah מלאכה of 13 tohor spirits/אל רחום חנון etc., as the basis by which the Oral Torah interprets the k’vanna of Torah commandments applicable to even lower עבודה commandments when these secondary תולדות commandments used as בניני אבות\precedents — in order to derive the prophetic mussar of מלאכה wisdom as the k’vanna of time-oriented commandments. Shabbat the classic example of the מלאכה wisdom of not just this one commandment but all other time oriented commandments which have their own unique מלאכה wisdom k’vanna just as shabbat has its own unique מלאכה wisdom k’vanna. The latter example the mesechta Shabbat of the Talmud defines the wisdom of Shabbat מלאכה as 39 principle labors required to construct the Mishkan. The Vulgate λατρεία view in the context of Shabbat מלאכה completely oblivious of this Torah wisdom. Therefore its Opus\ Servitium no different from the original Greek ἔργον – λατρεία verbs, both this and that translations utterly and totally fails to make the required distinction between מלאכה from עבודה.

      Most fundamentally the original NT Greek and later Vulgate Latin translations fail to differentiate between how the First Sinai commandment a מלאכה לשמה from the 2nd Sinai commandment an עבודה. This 2nd Sinai Commandment called עבודה זרה. Failure to differentiate between מלאכה from עבודה, exposes the fundamental lack of wisdom which eternally discerns and distinguishes acceptance of the Torah commandments לשמה from 2nd Commandment Golden Calf עבודה זרה word translations of Names of Gods. The first Sinai commandment a tohor Spirit not a Golden Calf word translation like the opening verse of the Gospel of John declares.

      Avodah Zarah in all its historical forms shares a single structural pattern: the attempt to replace the brit of the Avot with a later revelation that claims to supersede or overshadow it. From the Assyrian‑implanted Shomronim, to the communities behind the New Testament JeZeus God, to later universalist theologies in Islam which declare Yishmael bound at the Akadah etc. This אב טומא עבודה זרה, inclusive of statute law halachic religious codifications to post Napoleon Jewish ערב רב sectarian movements. The recurring claim—that they—not the seed of Avraham, Yitzhak, and Yaakov—inherit the “covenantal center”. In every case, the brit of the Avot—displaced and a foreign center—elevated in its place. Whether that “center” — theological, geographic, or cultural or vertical “Star Court” statute law courts. אב טומא עבודה זרה in its very essence employs replacement theology: the relocation of the axis of holiness away from the brit אש forged with the Avot, and toward a later system that declares itself the new Yerushalayim.

Leave a reply to #messianism Cancel reply

Discover more from The American Minervan

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading