Skip to content

Albert Pike Ponders on Lucifer in Morals and Dogma: Tells Us to Seek the Light of Knowledge

There has been only one line in all of the pages of Albert Pike’s Morals and Dogma, used and cited numerously to accuse him of praising Lucifer or Evil in his book, and propagating “Luciferianism.” This false claim about Morals and Dogma and misperception about Albert Pike is simple to disrupt and untangle, by providing the full paragraph and context this line comes from and is used by Anti-Mason conspiracists: “LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning!”

Albert Pike (1809-1891). Episcopalian-Freemason of the Scottish Rite Order.

In Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry (1871), Episcopalian-Freemason of the Scottish Rite, Albert Pike writes exaggeratedly and ponderously in question, “LUCIFER, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable blinds feeble, for traditions are full of sensual or selfish Souls? Doubt it not!” (Pike, Morals and Dogma, p. 321, see Ch. XIX: Grand Pontiff). In this same passage, the unfairly slandered Albert Pike writes, that the Apocalypse is the apotheosis (the putting aside) of that sublime faith that aspires to “God alone,” and “despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer.

Here in full context, Pike states he despises Lucifer’s pride. He speaks insignificantly of the angel of legend in this Chapter XIX: Grand Pontiff, rather than praise the character, which he equates with sensual depravity, human selfishness and egotism. The strong-minded and extraordinarily learned Albert Pike, eager to share his knowledge, as many of us do, valued education, and encouraged his fellows to further their education (liberal arts) — to seek the ‘light of knowledge.’ For Pike, this ‘light of knowledge’ he tells us in Morals and Dogma is God, the Bible, the liberal arts, and arcane knowledge, i.e., ancient philosophy and the meaning of the expressions and symbolism in traditions and old religion. In this case, it is also important to understand what Helena P. Blavatsky writes about LUCIFER, and also others when we aren’t getting imaginatively carried away into semi-mystical expression.

This is The Secret Doctrine Index’s mentions of Lucifer.

LUCIFER—is the Adversary (relative to Nemesis – ancient Greek god) in its lowest aspect and Logos in its highest aspect; both Holy Ghost and Satan; is referred to as AETHER, astral light by Levi, and Harbinger of Light; confers spiritual immortality in the legend; is the essence of the “Universal Mind” (Sk. MAHAT) and is the spirit of intellect; the first archangel from CHAOS; is an older, or higher god than Jehovah — a minor god; the name of a Pontiff and Christian sect; is (or in) the mind; was called Venus by Christians; and the Verbum are one.

In her work, H.P.B. attempted to give a philosophical view, which corrects and rids the philosophical and theological issues created from the Biblical concepts of Hell, Satan and Lucifer. This was done to revive the true philosophical meanings and what the legends relate to in the Mysteries. The idea, that H.P.B. was reinterpreting the Book of GENESIS for the diabolical nefarious purpose of spreading so-called “luciferianism” is rooted in incompetence and dishonesty of the character or accuser. Both Helena P. Blavatsky and Albert Pike were the people they were precisely because of their strong-mindedness. It must be said also, that while Pike was Christian-oriented, despite the opinions of others who would deny him this, Blavatsky, a Buddhist was not.

Travis Simpkins Portrait Sketch of Albert Pike.


In the same Morals and Dogma as shown, Albert Pike, besides encouraging Masons to seek the light of knowledge and the liberal arts, encourages us to be protectors of the people, and to help them. There are Americans, that are too often ignorant of the ideas and movements, that lay behind their nation’s foundations or their ideas of progress, besides the legacy of racism, the Confederacy and colonialism. Manly P. Hall says in one of his lectures, that Pike was physically and intellectually, a tall towering giant, and a Platonist, with an encyclopedic knowledge.

“Masonry will do all in its power, by direct exertion and co-operation, to improve and inform as well as to protect the people; to better their physical condition, relieve their miseries, supply their wants, and minister to their necessities. Let every Mason in this, good work do all that may be in his power. (…) Above all things let us never forget that mankind constitutes one great brotherhood; all born to encounter suffering and sorrow, and therefore bound to sympathize with each other. For no tower of Pride was ever yet high enough to lift its possessor above the trials and fears and frailties of humanity.” (Pike, Ch. XI : Sublime Elect of the Twelve, or Prince Ameth, p. 180)

Albert Pike explains the REPUBLICAN PHILOSOPHY of the Enlightenment and Revolution plainly to his readers (also see Albert Pike on the Republican Ideal), which is actually counter to the positions of the New Right, or subversive political Right forces in our times. Pike was a political idealist, but not as false conspiracies from the Taxil letters hoax portray.

Pike expressed in his magnum opus the philosophy of republicanism in his work when he wrote, that:

From the political point of view there is but a single principle,— the sovereignty of man over himself. This sovereignty of one’s self over one’s self is called Liberty. Where two or several of these sovereignties associate, the State begins. But in this association there is no abdication. Each sovereignty parts with a certain portion of itself to form the common right. That portion is the same for all. There is equal contribution by all to the joint sovereignty. This identity of concession which each makes to all, is EqualityThe common right is nothing more or less than the protection of all, pouring its rays on each. This protection of each by all, is Fraternity. Liberty is the summit, Equality the base. Equality is not all vegetation on a level, a society of big spears of grass and stunted oaks, a neighborhood of jealousies, emasculating each other. It is, civilly, all aptitudes having equal opportunity; politically, all votes having equal weight; religiously, all consciences having equal rights.” (Pike, Ch. II : The Fellow-Craft, p. 44)

Regarding education, speaking of intellect and the soul of the People, he says with power!

Intellect is to the people and the people’s Force, what the slender needle of the compass is to the ship — its soul, always counselling the huge mass of wood and iron, and always pointing to the north. To attack the citadels built up on all sides against the human race by superstitions, despotisms, and prejudices, the Force must have a brain and a law. Then its deeds of daring produce permanent results, and there is real progress. Then there are sublime conquests. Thought is a force, and philosophy should be an energy, finding its aim and its effects in the amelioration of mankind. The two great motors are Truth and Love. When all these Forces are combined, and guided by the Intellect, and regulated by the Rule of Right, and Justice, and of combined and systematic movement and effort, the great revolution prepared for by the ages will begin to march. The Power of the Deity Himself is in equilibrium with His Wisdom. Hence only results HARMONY.” (Pike, Morals and Dogma – Ch. I : Apprentice, The Twelve-Inch Rule and Common Gavel, p. 1)


  1. “Apotheosis” doe not mean “putting aside” as this article claims. This false definitions totally changes the meaning of Pike’s quote. Look up the meaning of apotheosis and reread the quote; then you will see how this article is deceptive, either inadvertandly or purposefully.


    • It is precisely the Greek etymology of the term, apotheosis, meaning to put away, to change. The original quote:

      “…the Apotheosis of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone, and despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer.”

      I’m being incredibly honest against the ridiculous accusation that he praises Lucifer. It is the complete opposite. I gave the etymology in parentheses, not brackets. Brackets would indicate a placeholder word. I should have put Gr. in front.

      Despite your hostility, all Pike means is the exaltation of that Sublime Faith which aspires to God alone. You might want to be more polite in introducing yourself before an audience. I don’t entertain clowns.


      • No, he’s absolutely correct…your claim that apotheosis meaning putting aside is blatantly false. I’m both Greek and a linguistic aficionado: apotheosis quite literally means to become god. Theos is God in Greek (as you well know considering you wrote an article on the etymology of the word “theosophy”), and that is inherent in any interpretation of the word apotheosis, especially in the context that Pike would be familiar with in his day, especially considering the obvious gnostic theme of the book, it makes perfect sense that he’d mean it in the only way the word is used. Why would you use apotheosis, a word known only to mean deification, to mean put aside? That’s like using the word pansexual but only using it’s prefix ‘pan’ in your sentence that has nothing to do with sexuality…that’s stupid. Investigativetheology was not being hostile or a clown, he was just as shocked as anyone with knowledge of the word at the ludicrous idea that apotheosis means to put aside.


  2. Demetrios is correct about the meaning, but he is still dead wrong. It is simple for me to apologize for the mistake, but i doubt they’d apologize for their obvious misreading and profound blindness. Both of you have a belief about Pike based in error that my simple article corrects for anyone to see. Your point about Pike still does not hold. Apotheosis in this context, even using the correct meaning of deification, Pike never speaks about the Apotheosis of Lucifer.

    Pike clearly wrote “the Apotheosis of faith.” He is speaking about the highest development of Christianity, and clearly writes he despises the qualities associated with Lucifer such as pomp and pride. READ! He is talking about the Book of Apocalypse being the highest piece of literature in the Christian faith, raising it to divine status, and in a Gnostic sense, he sees the book as an initiatory vision.


    “the Apocalypse is the apotheosis (correct meaning of apotheosis input = exaltation, deification, raising up to the highest development) of that sublime faith that aspires to “God alone,” and “despises all the pomps and works of Lucifer.”

    All my readers can see your mistake, which is why I have not replied. You’re both being very rude and insult your own intelligence. I don’t care what you are in the area of linguistics. Anti-masonry is steeped in lies and dishonesty. It’s dishonorable and sad.


    • Are you a freemason, Dominique Johnson? Apotheosis has clear meaning; no matter your truth, Albert Pike was an evil man. If you read the mason’s bible and do not take it for evil, then, 1. you deceive, and you know that you are lying, or 2. This resonance isn’t for you child, pray it fall silent on sleeping ears. So which is it? Which God do you serve? Align with Albert Pike? Keep defending the evil resonance? Makes no difference, as you lead yourself down baron and unfruitful paths. Your god will betray you as you will be left alone to face the Infinite God. I love you child, you have an infinite number of lives to perfect your soul. Surely you know best, although I believe your god has left you deaf, dumb, and blind in this world. Death finds you. Be courageous and fear-not though, child, you have a tough judgement ahead of you. We all do, as the Eternal Morning Follows The Night…and in knowing that… And So We Also, Even We, May Light A Little Taper, To Illuminate The Darkness While It Lasts. Surely even you freemason’s can turn your faces to God again? Through. Christ. Our. Lord. Amen.


      • You think you speak to a child. I’ll keep your comment up as an example. I’d like to show some friends the ignorance I deal with. It’s boring and predictable. You’ve contributed and disproved absolutely nothing in this conversation and enriched nothing of your own knowledge. Something easily fixable with this article. Christ must’ve made you blind.


  3. “Masonry will do all in its power, by direct exertion and co-operation, to improve and inform as well as to protect the people; to better their physical condition, relieve their miseries, supply their wants, and minister to their necessities.”

    Socialism for the peasants; red meat and private jets for the globalists. Socialism leads to Communism. “Direct exertion” over my life by Masons to provide me with wants and needs? Are you freaking kidding me? History has not been kind to socialist governments. All that existed prior to current socialist governments in existence failed. Washington was a Mason. They could all have been Masons. In fact, a man running for local office who was endorsed by the treasurer said that all presidents were Masons. That’s not what the evidence suggests, but he seemed confident saying it was so. He wanted my vote and handed me a card. On the card was a photo of him making the Masonic hidden hand gesture. There’s no required legal registry. Who would want their name redacted from a philanthropic organization? Why does such an organization need secrets? Secrets somehow helps to make charity even better than a pre-Masonic world, apparently. The logic isn’t there, but please continue shilling for Masons. The man I met running for legislator said that Masons wouldn’t chop the top of your skull off “unless that person really screwed up”. He wasn’t smiling, laughing or being sarcastic. No votes for Masons!


    • You’re very nasty and disrespectful, yet here you are talking about me shilling for Masons. Maybe someone else mental will stoop to your level m8. Won’t be me. If you continue to be disrespectful and uncivil, you’ll be blocked.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: